| Rank | Team | Power Ranking |
| 1 | New England Patriots | 1.000 |
| 2 | Atlanta Falcons | 0.922 |
| 3 | New York Jets | 0.836 |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 0.820 |
| 5 | Baltimore Ravens | 0.817 |
| 6 | Philadelphia Eagles | 0.815 |
| 7 | Chicago Bears | 0.791 |
| 8 | Green Bay Packers | 0.757 |
| 9 | New Orleans Saints | 0.707 |
| 10 | Tennessee Titans | 0.701 |
| 11 | San Diego Chargers | 0.697 |
| 12 | New York Giants | 0.697 |
| 13 | Miami Dolphins | 0.692 |
| 14 | Kansas City Chiefs | 0.687 |
| 15 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 0.685 |
| 16 | Indianapolis Colts | 0.679 |
| 17 | Cleveland Browns | 0.678 |
| 18 | Oakland Raiders | 0.646 |
| 19 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 0.641 |
| 20 | Seattle Seahawks | 0.613 |
| 21 | St. Louis Rams | 0.601 |
| 22 | Houston Texans | 0.593 |
| 23 | Minnesota Vikings | 0.585 |
| 24 | Washington Redskins | 0.582 |
| 25 | Dallas Cowboys | 0.577 |
| 26 | San Francisco 49ers | 0.574 |
| 27 | Detroit Lions | 0.565 |
| 28 | Arizona Cardinals | 0.550 |
| 29 | Buffalo Bills | 0.547 |
| 30 | Denver Broncos | 0.540 |
| 31 | Cincinnati Bengals | 0.496 |
| 32 | Carolina Panthers | 0.452 |
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Power Rankings (Week 16)
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
Power Rankings (Week 15)
This Week:
| Ranking | Team | Power Ranking |
| 1 | New England Patriots | 1.000 |
| 2 | Atlanta Falcons | 0.957 |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 0.869 |
| 4 | New York Jets | 0.841 |
| 5 | Baltimore Ravens | 0.822 |
| 6 | Philadelphia Eagles | 0.821 |
| 7 | Green Bay Packers | 0.813 |
| 8 | Chicago Bears | 0.798 |
| 9 | New Orleans Saints | 0.761 |
| 10 | New York Giants | 0.747 |
| 11 | Miami Dolphins | 0.740 |
| 12 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 0.727 |
| 13 | Cleveland Browns | 0.725 |
| 14 | Tennessee Titans | 0.717 |
| 15 | San Diego Chargers | 0.707 |
| 16 | Kansas City Chiefs | 0.697 |
| 17 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 0.684 |
| 18 | Indianapolis Colts | 0.670 |
| 19 | Oakland Raiders | 0.664 |
| 20 | Seattle Seahawks | 0.658 |
| 21 | St. Louis Rams | 0.641 |
| 22 | Minnesota Vikings | 0.632 |
| 23 | Houston Texans | 0.625 |
| 24 | Washington Redskins | 0.623 |
| 25 | San Francisco 49ers | 0.623 |
| 26 | Arizona Cardinals | 0.603 |
| 27 | Dallas Cowboys | 0.583 |
| 28 | Denver Broncos | 0.572 |
| 29 | Detroit Lions | 0.562 |
| 30 | Buffalo Bills | 0.536 |
| 31 | Cincinnati Bengals | 0.487 |
| 32 | Carolina Panthers | 0.451 |
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Power Rankings (Week 14)
This week's:
| Rank | Team | Power Ranking |
| 1 | New England Patriots | 1.000 |
| 2 | Atlanta Falcons | 0.997 |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 0.912 |
| 4 | New York Jets | 0.908 |
| 5 | Green Bay Packers | 0.851 |
| 6 | Chicago Bears | 0.846 |
| 7 | Philadelphia Eagles | 0.839 |
| 8 | Baltimore Ravens | 0.829 |
| 9 | New York Giants | 0.776 |
| 10 | Tennessee Titans | 0.767 |
| 11 | Cleveland Browns | 0.765 |
| 12 | New Orleans Saints | 0.757 |
| 13 | Kansas City Chiefs | 0.734 |
| 14 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 0.727 |
| 15 | Miami Dolphins | 0.726 |
| 16 | Oakland Raiders | 0.719 |
| 17 | Seattle Seahawks | 0.706 |
| 18 | San Diego Chargers | 0.701 |
| 19 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 0.694 |
| 20 | Houston Texans | 0.682 |
| 21 | St. Louis Rams | 0.680 |
| 22 | Indianapolis Colts | 0.669 |
| 23 | Washington Redskins | 0.654 |
| 24 | Minnesota Vikings | 0.651 |
| 25 | Denver Broncos | 0.635 |
| 26 | Dallas Cowboys | 0.611 |
| 27 | Arizona Cardinals | 0.603 |
| 28 | San Francisco 49ers | 0.601 |
| 29 | Detroit Lions | 0.582 |
| 30 | Buffalo Bills | 0.534 |
| 31 | Cincinnati Bengals | 0.493 |
| 32 | Carolina Panthers | 0.464 |
So let's take a look at the magnitudes of the power rankings. The Falcons and the Patriots are neck and neck, then a gap, then the Jets and Steelers, then a gap, and then the rest. The Colts are getting hammered, while the Browns are still hanging around. One of the failures of my rankings is how to judge a team like the Titans, which came strong out of the gate, and now is kind of falling apart due to quarterback issues.
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Power Rankings (Week 13)
Pretty good shake-up at the top. Here we go:
| Ranking | Team | Power Ranking |
| 1 | Atlanta Falcons | 1.000 |
| 2 | New England Patriots | 0.991 |
| 3 | New York Jets | 0.977 |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 0.929 |
| 5 | Baltimore Ravens | 0.869 |
| 6 | Chicago Bears | 0.855 |
| 7 | Green Bay Packers | 0.854 |
| 8 | Philadelphia Eagles | 0.849 |
| 9 | Tennessee Titans | 0.782 |
| 10 | Kansas City Chiefs | 0.775 |
| 11 | New Orleans Saints | 0.773 |
| 12 | Cleveland Browns | 0.773 |
| 13 | New York Giants | 0.769 |
| 14 | Miami Dolphins | 0.757 |
| 15 | San Diego Chargers | 0.752 |
| 16 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 0.739 |
| 17 | Houston Texans | 0.732 |
| 18 | Seattle Seahawks | 0.728 |
| 19 | Indianapolis Colts | 0.727 |
| 20 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 0.727 |
| 21 | Oakland Raiders | 0.704 |
| 22 | St. Louis Rams | 0.688 |
| 23 | Washington Redskins | 0.682 |
| 24 | Minnesota Vikings | 0.645 |
| 25 | Denver Broncos | 0.631 |
| 26 | San Francisco 49ers | 0.622 |
| 27 | Arizona Cardinals | 0.617 |
| 28 | Detroit Lions | 0.602 |
| 29 | Dallas Cowboys | 0.576 |
| 30 | Buffalo Bills | 0.576 |
| 31 | Cincinnati Bengals | 0.521 |
| 32 | Carolina Panthers | 0.485 |
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
Power Rankings (Week 12)
This week I looked at home field advantage. My metric was pretty simple, from 2004-2009, I summed up all the win ratings for home games, and divided it by all the win ratings from away game. In the end I have a percentage, the average percentage increase for home games (compared to away games). I'm not truly measuring the advantage a home stadium provides, but rather, the difference in how well a team plays at home vs. on the road. For instance, I'm not determining if a team's a good home team or a bad road team. Anyway, below are the breakdowns (ranked highest to lowest):
| Team | Home Field Increase |
| Minnesota Vikings | 40.59% |
| Kansas City Chiefs | 39.60% |
| Houston Texans | 37.42% |
| Arizona Cardinals | 35.76% |
| Baltimore Ravens | 29.16% |
| Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 25.09% |
| Buffalo Bills | 23.19% |
| Chicago Bears | 23.17% |
| Cleveland Browns | 19.23% |
| Seattle Seahawks | 18.51% |
| Washington Redskins | 17.62% |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | 16.80% |
| Dallas Cowboys | 16.66% |
| Detroit Lions | 16.30% |
| San Diego Chargers | 15.28% |
| New Orleans Saints | 15.13% |
| St. Louis Rams | 14.84% |
| Indianapolis Colts | 14.65% |
| Atlanta Falcons | 11.94% |
| Tennessee Titans | 11.80% |
| Denver Broncos | 10.81% |
| San Francisco 49ers | 10.35% |
| New York Jets | 8.84% |
| Green Bay Packers | 6.32% |
| Oakland Raiders | 5.53% |
| New York Giants | 4.38% |
| Jacksonville Jaguars | 3.67% |
| Cincinnati Bengals | 3.34% |
| Miami Dolphins | 2.19% |
| Carolina Panthers | 0.63% |
| Philadelphia Eagles | -0.50% |
| New England Patriots | -3.76% |
Can't say I'm too surprised by the numbers. For instance, 3 of the top 5 home field advantages are domes (providing advantageous playing conditions as well as keeping in the noise); and one of the other top 5 home field advantages is that noted Kansas City crowd. On the other end of the scale, the Eagles and the Patriots actually play better on the road. Now for these numbers, I only did one regression, that is, I didn't take into account the home / away disparity for the team a team was playing. For instance, if Minnesota is a noted bad road team, I did not take that into account when they played Green Bay @ Green Bay (I know, sounds a little convoluted, but like my normal power rankings, I would like to incorporate some recursion). Another odd note, adding a home field advantage component when trying to pick games using my Power Rankings doesn't help; the pure weekly rankings are still the best way to go. I'll explore the recursion problem in the near future, and see if I can get the prediction a little better. And, as always, this week's rankings:
| Rank | Team | Power Ranking |
| 1 | New York Jets | 1.000 |
| 2 | New England Patriots | 0.989 |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 0.940 |
| 4 | Atlanta Falcons | 0.936 |
| 5 | Philadelphia Eagles | 0.885 |
| 6 | Green Bay Packers | 0.877 |
| 7 | Baltimore Ravens | 0.860 |
| 8 | Tennessee Titans | 0.810 |
| 9 | Chicago Bears | 0.794 |
| 10 | Indianapolis Colts | 0.765 |
| 11 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 0.763 |
| 12 | Cleveland Browns | 0.751 |
| 13 | New Orleans Saints | 0.733 |
| 14 | Kansas City Chiefs | 0.728 |
| 15 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 0.723 |
| 16 | Miami Dolphins | 0.722 |
| 17 | New York Giants | 0.721 |
| 18 | Seattle Seahawks | 0.714 |
| 19 | Oakland Raiders | 0.704 |
| 20 | San Diego Chargers | 0.703 |
| 21 | Washington Redskins | 0.699 |
| 22 | Houston Texans | 0.688 |
| 23 | St. Louis Rams | 0.651 |
| 24 | Denver Broncos | 0.637 |
| 25 | Minnesota Vikings | 0.611 |
| 26 | Arizona Cardinals | 0.596 |
| 27 | Detroit Lions | 0.594 |
| 28 | San Francisco 49ers | 0.576 |
| 29 | Dallas Cowboys | 0.568 |
| 30 | Buffalo Bills | 0.545 |
| 31 | Cincinnati Bengals | 0.510 |
| 32 | Carolina Panthers | 0.441 |
What's surprising is Cleveland is getting a lot of love, best 3-6 team ever. Raiders took a dive, and still no love for the Chargers.
Tuesday, November 16, 2010
Power Rankings (Week 11)
So how good is my ranking system, based solely on points per yard (and then put through the regressive formula)? Well, the obvious metric is how well the ranking system picks winners, how many times the higher ranked team wins. Below, I iterate through 6 seasons (calculate the power rankings each week, and see how well those rankings pick winners). I compare it against the most simple ranking system I could think of, based solely on wins / losses (if two teams have the exact same record, I just randomly picked one to win). Also, I throw out the first two weeks (can't really calculate wins / losses with so few games). Enjoy:
| Year | Picked Correctly | |
| Simple Ranking | My Ranking | |
| 2004 | 60.7% | 70.1% |
| 2005 | 64.3% | 68.3% |
| 2006 | 58.5% | 61.6% |
| 2007 | 65.6% | 69.6% |
| 2008 | 61.8% | 67.9% |
| 2009 | 62.1% | 66.1% |
So, as you can see, I'm slightly better than just always picking the team with more wins. I'm right about 67% of the time, vs. 60% for the simple approach. Apparently, 2006 was a screwy year. And below, this week's ranking:
| Rank | Team | Power Ranking |
| 1 | New York Jets | 1.000 |
| 2 | New England Patriots | 0.964 |
| 3 | Atlanta Falcons | 0.940 |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 0.934 |
| 5 | Baltimore Ravens | 0.878 |
| 6 | Philadelphia Eagles | 0.862 |
| 7 | Green Bay Packers | 0.850 |
| 8 | Tennessee Titans | 0.821 |
| 9 | Indianapolis Colts | 0.803 |
| 10 | Cleveland Browns | 0.774 |
| 11 | Chicago Bears | 0.760 |
| 12 | Seattle Seahawks | 0.759 |
| 13 | New York Giants | 0.746 |
| 14 | Oakland Raiders | 0.741 |
| 15 | Miami Dolphins | 0.740 |
| 16 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 0.728 |
| 17 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 0.722 |
| 18 | New Orleans Saints | 0.707 |
| 19 | Kansas City Chiefs | 0.701 |
| 20 | Houston Texans | 0.701 |
| 21 | St. Louis Rams | 0.679 |
| 22 | Denver Broncos | 0.678 |
| 23 | San Diego Chargers | 0.675 |
| 24 | Washington Redskins | 0.657 |
| 25 | Arizona Cardinals | 0.633 |
| 26 | Detroit Lions | 0.628 |
| 27 | Minnesota Vikings | 0.623 |
| 28 | San Francisco 49ers | 0.606 |
| 29 | Cincinnati Bengals | 0.548 |
| 30 | Dallas Cowboys | 0.517 |
| 31 | Buffalo Bills | 0.506 |
| 32 | Carolina Panthers | 0.452 |
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Power Rankings (Week 10)
And here we go:
| Rank | Team | Power Ranking |
| 1 | Pittsburgh Steelers | 1.000 |
| 2 | New York Jets | 0.951 |
| 3 | Atlanta Falcons | 0.914 |
| 4 | Baltimore Ravens | 0.891 |
| 5 | New England Patriots | 0.888 |
| 6 | Tennessee Titans | 0.842 |
| 7 | Green Bay Packers | 0.819 |
| 8 | Philadelphia Eagles | 0.816 |
| 9 | Indianapolis Colts | 0.804 |
| 10 | New York Giants | 0.796 |
| 11 | Cleveland Browns | 0.788 |
| 12 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 0.758 |
| 13 | Houston Texans | 0.740 |
| 14 | Oakland Raiders | 0.736 |
| 15 | Kansas City Chiefs | 0.732 |
| 16 | Seattle Seahawks | 0.726 |
| 17 | Chicago Bears | 0.719 |
| 18 | St. Louis Rams | 0.718 |
| 19 | New Orleans Saints | 0.716 |
| 20 | San Diego Chargers | 0.680 |
| 21 | Miami Dolphins | 0.674 |
| 22 | Washington Redskins | 0.671 |
| 23 | Arizona Cardinals | 0.666 |
| 24 | Detroit Lions | 0.661 |
| 25 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 0.652 |
| 26 | Minnesota Vikings | 0.632 |
| 27 | Denver Broncos | 0.607 |
| 28 | Cincinnati Bengals | 0.571 |
| 29 | San Francisco 49ers | 0.550 |
| 30 | Carolina Panthers | 0.458 |
| 31 | Buffalo Bills | 0.454 |
| 32 | Dallas Cowboys | 0.445 |
Still surprising that the Jets still sit up so high. And it's still showing the AFC's dominance over the NFC. Lo and behold....the Cowboys are the worst team. No complaints here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)